There are many ways you can block users from accessing websites they shouldn’t be, such as firewalls, proxy servers, DNS servers, etc. However, if you have a small setup, chances are you may not have any of these in place already, and you may be reluctant add another piece of equipment to your network.

This is where your Cisco router can come to the rescue again.

(Note: No matter how small your network is, it is highly recommended that you do use firewall(s) to protect your network, whether they come in the form of software installed on each PC, or CBAC configured on your border router).

Using NBAR and a policy map, you can have your URL filtering set up in a matter of seconds. Here’s an example:

class-map match-any BLOCKED_SITES
 match protocol http host "*facebook*"
 match protocol http host "*youtube*"
policy-map DROP_TRAFFIC
interface Dialer1
 service-policy output DROP_TRAFFIC

The configuration is quite self explanatory.

Step 1: You simply create a class-map and use the “match protocol” command to specify the URLs you’d like to block.

(Note: You can use Regular Expressions to match the URL. This is what the asterisks (*) mean in the example strings above).

Step 2: Create a policy-map that tells the router what to do with traffic that matches the criteria set out by the class-map.

Step 3: Apply the policy-map to your Internet facing interface, in the outbound direction.

You can then verify that your configuration is working by issuing the “sh policy-map interface dialer 1” command:

Router#show policy-map interface dialer 1

Service-policy output: DROP_TRAFFIC

Class-map: BLOCKED_SITES (match-any)
 36 packets, 44247 bytes
 5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
 Match: protocol http host "*facebook*"
 10 packets, 8391 bytes
 5 minute rate 0 bps
 Match: protocol http host "*youtube*"
 26 packets, 35856 bytes
 5 minute rate 0 bps

Unfortunately, URL filtering is not 100% reliable and can be circumvented quite easily, however, it is a good technique to know nevertheless.

Note: Some people feel that using an outbound ACL on your Internet facing interface is sufficient. However, as the ACL statically defines a public IP address, if the website’s IP address changes or if the site is load balanced over several IPs, the ACL will not be sufficient. By applying your filter based on the URL, you can be sure that the site will always be blocked so long as it never changes its name.

If they make no sense to you, please re-read my previous posts for more information.

As always, if you have any questions or have a topic that you would like me to discuss, please feel free to post a comment at the bottom of this blog entry, e-mail at, or drop me a message on Reddit (OzNetNerd).

Note: The opinions expressed in this blog are my own and not those of my employer.

Leave a comment