If you’re fairly new to coding chances are you’ve run into an issue where you make a minor change in one place, and then end up breaking your script in another place. In order to find out what went wrong you start adding
While it sound like a good idea, what you’re actually doing is relying on Python to tell you when you’ve made a syntactical error. However, what if your syntax is find, but your code is incorrect?
For example, say you accidentally changed your
addition function to a multiplication function by replacing the
+ with a
def addition(a, b): return a * b
Python isn’t going to tell you you’ve made an error because your syntax is perfectly legal. The only way you’ll know that there’s a problem is when you see the result posted from your script. If the result goes unnoticed though, the bug will remain until someone does notice.
Once you’ve realised there is a problem, the
It’s safe to say that I found myself in this situation many times when I first started coding. Just when I was about to begin pulling my hair out I thought to myself, “there has to be a better way!”. And sure enough, there is.
While unittest is part of the Python standard library, I much prefer py.test as it is much cleaner to read and write, and is very powerful too.
As with just about everything with Python, installation is easy as:
sudo pip install pytest
In a nutshell, you use pytest to ensure that your code produces the correct results. Let’s take a look at this example in the pytest documentation:
# content of test_assert1.py def f(): return 3 def test_function(): assert f() == 4
Here we see two functions:
f(): Returns the integer 3.
test_function() : assert s that
f()will return 4.
f() returns a result that is different to the test assertion, pytest will alert us to this:
$ pytest test_assert1.py ======= test session starts ======== platform linux -- Python 3.x.y, pytest-3.x.y, py-1.x.y, pluggy-0.x.y rootdir: $REGENDOC_TMPDIR, inifile: collected 1 item test_assert1.py F ======= FAILURES ======== _______ test_function ________ def test_function(): > assert f() == 4 E assert 3 == 4 E + where 3 = f() test_assert1.py:5: AssertionError ======= 1 failed in 0.12 seconds ========
Making minor modifications to this code enables us to create a test for our
def addition(a, b): return a * b def test_addition(): assert addition(4, 5) == 9
Doing so produces the following results:
F:\Will>pytest -v test_addition.py ============================= test session starts ============================= platform win32 -- Python 2.7.13, pytest-3.1.2, py-1.4.34, pluggy-0.4.0 -- c:\python27\python.exe cachedir: .cache rootdir: F:\Will, inifile: plugins: cov-2.5.1 collected 1 items test_addition.py::test_addition FAILED ================================== FAILURES =================================== ________________________________ test_addition ________________________________ def test_addition(): > assert addition(4, 5) == 9 E assert 20 == 9 E + where 20 = addition(4, 5) test_addition.py:5: AssertionError ========================== 1 failed in 0.03 seconds ===========================
And there you have it! Not only do we now know that your code is syntactically correct, but we also know that it is producing the results we expected. If someone makes a change to the function and the wrong figure is produced as a result, pytest will alert you to it.
Using this technique to automate unit testing will save you a massive amount of time because it’s not only automatic, but it tells you exactly where the error is. No longer will you need to include temporary
Update: If you enjoy using pytest, you might also be intersted in my Allure2: A GUI for your code tests post too.
As always, if you have any questions or have a topic that you would like me to discuss, please feel free to post a comment at the bottom of this blog entry, e-mail at firstname.lastname@example.org, or drop me a message on Reddit (OzNetNerd).
Note: The opinions expressed in this blog are my own and not those of my employer.